The Canadian Encyclopedia — neutral, cited, updated
July 26, 2026Sources cited
Canadianwire.
Canada’s encyclopedia & explainer
HomeCrime & JusticeHistorical CrimeLeo Frank
Crime & Justice • Historical Crime

Leo Frank

Leo Frank was an American factory superintendent who was convicted in 1913 for the murder of Mary Phagan in Atlanta, Georgia, and later lynched in 1915.

By Ethan Anderson| Reviewed by Olivia Bennett, Standards & Fact-Checking Lead| Updated July 26, 2026|2 min read| Fact-checked

Leo Frank was an American factory superintendent convicted in 1913 for the murder of Mary Phagan in Atlanta, Georgia, and later lynched in 1915. His case became one of the most famous criminal cases in U.S. history, drawing widespread attention to antisemitism, due process, and mob violence. Contemporary scholarship has widely questioned his conviction, and he received a posthumous pardon in 1986.

Early life and career

Leo Max Frank was born on April 17, 1884, in Cuero, Texas. He later worked in the pencil-manufacturing industry and by 1913 was superintendent of the National Pencil Company in Atlanta, Georgia.

Mary Phagan case

In April 1913, 13-year-old Mary Phagan, an employee at the National Pencil Company, was found murdered in the company building. Frank was arrested, tried, and convicted in a case that drew major public attention. His trial, appeals, and conviction attracted intense national attention.

Appeals, pardon, and lynching

Frank's conviction was appealed and later commuted from death to life imprisonment by Georgia governor John M. Slaton. On August 17, 1915, he was kidnapped from prison and lynched by a mob identifying itself as the Knights of Mary Phagan near Marietta, Georgia. Decades later, in 1986, the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a posthumous pardon.

Historical significance

The case became a landmark example in discussions of antisemitism, media sensationalism, capital punishment, and mob violence in the United States. It is also remembered for its role in influencing Jewish self-defence and civil-rights organizing. The case drew widespread attention to due process and antisemitism.

Key facts

  • Frank was a superintendent at the National Pencil Company in Atlanta, Georgia.
  • He was accused and convicted in 1913 of murdering 13-year-old Mary Phagan.
  • His trial, appeals, and conviction attracted intense national attention.
  • He was kidnapped from prison and lynched in 1915 by a mob identifying itself as the Knights of Mary Phagan.
  • Frank was posthumously pardoned by the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles in 1986.
🍁
Canadian context

The case is relevant to Canadian readers as a major North American example of antisemitism, miscarriage-of-justice debates, and the historical impact of mob violence and sensational press coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Who was Leo Frank?
Leo Frank was a Jewish-American factory superintendent in Atlanta, Georgia, who was convicted in 1913 of murdering Mary Phagan and was lynched in 1915.
What was Leo Frank convicted of?
He was convicted of the murder of Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old employee at the National Pencil Company in Atlanta.
Was Leo Frank later pardoned?
Yes. He received a posthumous pardon from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles in 1986.
Why is the Leo Frank case historically important?
It is remembered for its role in debates over antisemitism, the fairness of the justice system, and lynching in the American South.
Where and when was Leo Frank lynched?
He was kidnapped from custody and lynched near Marietta, Georgia, on August 17, 1915.

References

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannicahttps://www.britannica.com/biography/Leo-Frank
    Supports: Birth, death, occupation, conviction, lynching, and posthumous pardon.
  2. New Georgia Encyclopediahttps://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/leo-frank-case/
    Supports: Case history, antisemitism, lynching, and 1986 pardon.
  3. Library of Congresshttps://guides.loc.gov/chronicling-america-leo-frank
    Supports: Timeline of the trial, appeals, Supreme Court review, and lynching.
  4. Brandeis Universityhttps://www.brandeis.edu/library/archives/essays/special-collections/leo-frank-trial.html
    Supports: Trial context, public reaction, and significance of the case.